EVALUATION OF TREATMENT OUTCOMES FOR CALCANEAL FRACTURES IN THE SAMARKAND CLINICS

Abstract

Introduction. Calcaneal fractures are among the most challenging injuries of the foot, often resulting in long-term functional impairment. The study aimed to assess and compare the outcomes of minimally invasive screw osteosynthesis and open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) in patients with impacted calcaneal fractures.
Methods. Forty patients (31 men, 9 women) were treated between 2020–2025. Fractures were classified using the Essex–Lopresti and Sanders systems. Minimally invasive fixation was performed in 60% of cases. Outcomes were assessed using FAOS and radiological parameters.
Results. Excellent and good results were achieved in 77% of patients, satisfactory in 15%, unsatisfactory in 8%. The complication rate was 8% for MIO and 18% for ORIF. Minimally invasive fixation showed better cosmetic, functional, and rehabilitation outcomes.
Conclusion. Minimally invasive osteosynthesis is a reliable alternative to ORIF, ensuring anatomical restoration and early rehabilitation with fewer complications.